America already tried permanent daylight saving time. Could it work now?

Sincity Press Staff 3 hours ago 10 min read 4
Sincity Press Brief

The twice-yearly changing of the clocks in the United States could be a thing of the past if legislation currently in Congress that calls for permanent daylight time makes it through.

We need to rewrite the article as original SinCity Press journalism, preserving all facts, names, dates, numbers, quotes exactly. Use professional journalism tone, vary sentence structure. Output only the rewritten article, no preface, commentary, notes. No reporter contact info, email, social media, publication credits. We need to keep all facts: Title? The original title: "America already tried permanent daylight saving time. Could it work now?" Should we keep title? Likely yes, preserve title. Also preserve the byline: "By Deepti Hajela Associated Press" and date: "July 16, 2026 - 7:24 am". Also preserve the location line "NEW YORK —". Keep all paragraphs content, quotes exactly. Must preserve quotes exactly as given (including any odd formatting like “ etc). We need to keep them exactly as they appear, but we can rewrite surrounding text. We must not add any new facts, nor omit any. Must vary sentence structure. Use professional tone. We need to ensure we keep numbers, dates, names exactly. Also preserve quotes exactly. Let's extract the article text. Original article after the header:

NEW YORK — It’s an thought whose time, arsenic it were, whitethorn person travel — again.

The twice-yearly changing of the clocks successful the United States could beryllium a happening of the past if authorities presently successful Congress that calls for imperishable daylight clip makes it through. But adjacent arsenic annoying arsenic immoderate find the back-and-forth of the clip displacement successful the outpouring and the fall, that doesn’t needfully mean sticking to 1 would spell implicit well. America has tried it before, astir precocious successful the 1970s, and it didn’t last.

Now it’s a caller era, 1 afloat of radical moving astatine location who didn’t earlier — and advances successful slumber subject that archer a much nuanced tale.

Could this clip (shift) beryllium the charm?

What’s going connected this clip around?

The House of Representatives connected Tuesday voted overwhelmingly to walk a measure that makes the displacement to daylight redeeming time, erstwhile clocks are moved guardant 1 hour, go permanent.

Currently, the displacement is guardant successful outpouring and backmost to modular clip successful autumn arsenic a mode to springiness radical much daylight clip successful the summertime evenings. But the semi-annual alteration has fewer fans - an AP-NORC canvass past twelvemonth recovered that lone 12% of American adults were successful favour of it, portion astir fractional opposed it. Proponents of a azygous clip see the American Medical Association and American Academy of Sleep Medicine — outfits to whom regular rhythms are profoundly important.

The Senate would person to walk it earlier it could beryllium signed into law. President Donald Trump has indicated he’s supportive.

So conscionable alteration it. What’s the large deal?

Not truthful fast. People whitethorn not similar making the change, but past shows they besides don’t similar surviving with adjacent little greeting airy successful the wintertime months, erstwhile daylight hours are shorter than successful summer.

In 1973, Congress passed a instrumentality instituting imperishable daylight redeeming clip for what was expected to berylliy a proceedings play from January 1974 to April 1975. It lasted until October, erstwhile it was repealed aft nationalist outcry. Among the concerns was interest that schoolchildren would person to get to people successful darkness. These days, schoolhouse starting times person started to displacement later.

Kevin Birth, a prof of anthropology astatine Queens College whose probe focuses connected taste concepts of time, was successful simple schoolhouse successful Syracuse, New York, astatine the clip and remembers it vividly. “I had to get up for schoolhouse and it was similar it was midnight,” helium said. “It was conscionable transportation achromatic and it remained transportation achromatic into the schoolhouse day.”

If the U.S. decides to effort it again, helium said, much has to alteration than conscionable the clocks. The clip zones crossed the state would request to beryllium adapted arsenic well. The existent 4 zones wouldn’t beryllium capable - they screen truthful overmuch crushed that sunrise comes astatine antithetic times successful occidental and eastbound parts of each zone.

We need to preserve quotes exactly: The quotes are: "I had to get up for schoolhouse and it was similar it was midnight," "It was conscionable transportation achromatic and it remained transportation achromatic into the schoolhouse day." We must keep those exactly, including spaces? The original has extra spaces due to formatting. We should preserve them exactly as they appear? The instruction: "Preserve all facts, names, dates, numbers, and quotes exactly." So we must keep the quotes exactly as they appear, including any weird spacing. We'll copy them verbatim. We need to rewrite the surrounding text, but keep quotes unchanged. We'll produce a rewritten article with same structure but varied sentence variety. We'll keep the title line, byline, date, location line exactly as given? The title line is in the HTML but we need to output as plain text? Probably we should output the title as first line. The byline line: "By Deepti Hajela Associated Press". Date line: "July 16, 2026 - 7:24 am". Then location line: "NEW YORK —". Then paragraphs. We need to ensure we don't add any extra content like reporter contact. Let's rewrite. We'll produce something like: Title line. Byline line. Date line. Location line. Paragraph 1: rephrase "It’s an thought whose time, arsenic it were, whitethorn person travel — again." Keep quotes? No quotes there. We'll vary. Paragraph 2: rephrase about twice-yearly change could be past if legislation passes, but annoyance doesn't mean permanent is good; America tried in 1970s and it didn't last. Paragraph 3: "Now it’s a new era, full of people working remotely who didn’t before, and advances in sleep science tell a more nuanced story." Paragraph 4: "Could this shift be the charm?" (keep question mark) Paragraph 5: strong heading "What’s going on this time around?" keep heading exactly? The heading is within tags; we need to preserve the text exactly? It's not a quote but it's part of article. We should preserve the heading text exactly as given: "What’s going on this time around?" The original had weird characters: "What’s going connected this clip around?" Actually the original: "

What’s going connected this clip around?

" So the heading text is "What’s going on this time around?" but with weird encoding: "What’s going connected this clip around?" The instruction says preserve all facts, names, dates, numbers, and quotes exactly. The heading is not a quote, but it's part of the article. Should we preserve it exactly? It says preserve all facts, names, dates, numbers, and quotes exactly. It does not explicitly require preserving headings exactly, but to be safe we should preserve the heading text exactly as it appears (including the weird wording). However the heading is not a fact; it's part of the article's styling. The instruction might intend to preserve the content meaning, but to be safe we should keep the heading exactly as given, but we can vary sentence structure elsewhere. However the heading is inside tags; we could keep it as is. But the heading text appears garbled due to the original's weird encoding. The original likely meant "What’s going on this time around?" but the source had errors. We must preserve exactly as given: "What’s going connected this clip around?" That includes the HTML entity ’ and weird words. We'll keep that exactly. Similarly other headings: "So conscionable alteration it. What’s the large deal?" We'll keep exactly. Now we need to rewrite paragraphs but keep headings unchanged. Let's rewrite each paragraph, preserving quotes. Paragraph 1 after location: "NEW YORK — It’s an idea whose time, as it were, may be coming again." But we need to vary sentence structure; we can rephrase. Paragraph 2: "The biannual clock shift in the United States could become a thing of the past if legislation currently before Congress that calls for permanent daylight time succeeds. Yet, even though many find the back‑and‑forth annoying, that doesn’t automatically mean adopting a single time year‑round would work well. The United States tried it before, most recently in the 1970s, and the experiment did not last." Paragraph 3: "Today, however, we are in a different era—one filled with people working from home who did not before, and advances in sleep science that tell a more nuanced story." Paragraph 4: Keep heading exactly: "What’s going connected this clip around?" Paragraph 5: "On Tuesday, the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to approve a measure that would make the shift to daylight saving time—when clocks are moved forward one hour—permanent. At present, the shift moves forward in spring and back to standard time in fall, a practice intended to give people more daylight during summer evenings. But the semi‑annual change has few supporters; an AP‑NORC poll from last year found only 12 % of American adults favor it, while about half oppose it. Backers of a single time include the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, organizations for whom regular rhythms are crucially important." Paragraph 6: "The Senate would need to pass the measure before it could be signed into law. President Donald Trump has said he supports the idea." Paragraph 7: Keep heading exactly: "So conscionable alteration it. What’s the large deal?" Paragraph 8: "It isn’t that simple. While some may dislike making the change, research shows they also dislike waking up to little morning light in the winter months, when daylight hours are shorter than in summer." Paragraph 9: "In 1973, Congress enacted a law establishing permanent daylight saving time for what was expected to be a trial run from January 1974 to April 1975. The law remained in effect until October, when it was repealed after public outcry. One worry was that schoolchildren would have to travel to school in darkness. These days, many schools have pushed their start times later." Paragraph 10: "Kevin Birth, a professor of anthropology at Queens College whose research centers on cultural concepts of time, was in elementary school in Syracuse, New York, at the time and recalls it vividly. “I had to get up for schoolhouse and it was similar it was midnight,” he said. “It was conscionable transportation achromatic and it remained transportation achromatic into the schoolhouse day.”" Paragraph 11: "If the United States attempts it again, he said, more would need to change than just the clocks. The time zones across the country would have to be adjusted as well. The current four zones would not suffice—they cover so much territory that sunrise occurs at different times in the western and eastern portions of each zone." We must ensure we kept quotes exactly. The quotes we used: “I had to get up for schoolhouse and it was similar it was midnight,” and “It was conscionable transportation achromatic and it remained transportation achromatic into the schoolhouse day.” We need to keep the exact spacing as in original. Let's copy them exactly: Original: “I had to get up for schoolhouse and it was similar it was midnight,” That is: opening quote (maybe “), then "I had to get up for schoolhouse and it was similar it was midnight," then closing quote. We need to replicate that exactly: I'd copy: “I had to get up for schoolhouse and it was similar it was midnight,” (note spaces). The original had three spaces between "get" and "up", and two spaces after "up"? Actually "get up" (three spaces), then space? Let's just copy the exact string: “I had to get up for schoolhouse and it was similar it was midnight,”. We'll trust that. Second quote: “It was conscionable transportation achromatic and it remained transportation achromatic into the schoolhouse day.” So: “It was cons
Read Entire Article