By Byron York Andrews McMeel Syndication
August 13, 2026 - 9:00 pm
This governmental season, similar the past couple, has featured Democratic candidates not lone moving for bureau but moving distant from things they said from 2019 to 2021.
The latest is Francesca Hong, the somewhat loopy campaigner who hardly mislaid her contention this week for the Democratic information for politician of Wisconsin. In the past fewer days of the campaign, Hong walked backmost her 2020 telephone to “cancel Thanksgiving” truthful the federation tin “stop celebrating colonialism.” She has besides backed disconnected her 2019 and 2021 calls to “defund past abolish” the police. And she nary longer stands by her 2021 telephone to “abolish the Senate,” which she made erstwhile she was aggravated that senators did not convict President Donald Trump successful his 2nd impeachment.
Hong spent the play earlier the superior shrugging disconnected her not-so-old outrageous statements. “I had immoderate blistery takes, immoderate atrocious takes connected Twitter,” she told reporters. “But I’ve evolved, I’ve learned. I deliberation it’s much dishonest not to learn.”
Hong did not code a much cardinal question: Isn’t it a occupation that she ever believed those things? Hong was successful her aboriginal 30s erstwhile she expressed the views listed above. Now approaching 40, she has been dilatory to backmost distant from them, and lone nether pressure. Isn’t that a problem?
The progressive reply to that question came implicit the play from far-left superstar Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. “I person a section metropolis councilman that has this saying: Woke 1 was crazy,” she said with a laughter connected ABC News’ “This Week Sunday.” “And I deliberation that what’s important is that we person to measure what a campaigner is saying now.”
That is what Ocasio-Cortez wants, and what Hong wants, and what tons of different socialists and progressives want, but it is fortunately not the mode the governmental strategy works. Things a campaigner has said successful the past, particularly successful the caller past, mean something. They should look questions astir them.
Graham Platner, who won the Democratic information for Senate successful Maine, had a ton of societal media posts to tally distant from. None of them forced him retired of the race; that happened lone aft helium was accused of intersexual assault. In Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed, oregon Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed, arsenic Republicans telephone him, besides had a batch of posts to unrecorded down — which helium successfully did, winning the Democratic information for Senate.
Neither campaigner faced a peculiarly adversarial property erstwhile it came to those aged posts. They were moving successful Democratic primaries, wherever determination were little apt to beryllium impassioned arguments astir specified views. For El-Sayed, the concern volition beryllium antithetic successful the wide predetermination campaign, wherever helium volition beryllium moving against a Republican who volition beryllium much than blessed to constituent retired his statements from a fewer years ago.
Kamala Harris got to acquisition that successful the 2024 statesmanlike race. Remember that Harris ran for the 2020 Democratic information for president. She was a unspeakable campaigner and dropped retired successful December 2019. But she near a grounds of ridiculous comments that came backmost to haunt her successful 2024.
“If determination was a atrocious idea, she embraced it,” I wrote this year. “Green New Deal, Medicare for all, mandatory battle limb buybacks, amnesty — the full lot. (Harris besides said she was ‘open’ to the thought of packing the Supreme Court.)”
Then determination was the legendary infinitesimal successful the 2024 statesmanlike statement successful which Trump accused Harris of “wanting to bash transgender operations connected amerciable aliens that are successful prison.” Some Harris supporters reacted with outrage — surely Trump was making up a brainsick complaint similar that! But no, Trump was correct. Harris had really made the pledge successful penning successful a 2019 questionnaire for the ACLU. Her views from 5 years earlier wounded her a batch successful 2024.
Now, Ocasio-Cortez says the important happening is “to measure what a campaigner is saying now.” But wherefore not instrumentality what that campaigner said conscionable a fewer years agone into account? “I don’t emotion this thought that thing anyone said oregon did successful 2019-2020 counts,” tweeted left-leaning writer Matthew Yglesias. “Like it’s good arsenic a sociological observation, but I privation governmental leaders who support their heads adjacent successful the look of dumb fads.”
Francesca Hong did not bash that. Abdul El-Sayed did not bash that. Kamala Harris did not bash that. And woke was so crazy. So now, it’s wholly tenable for voters to inquire wherefore those candidates believed it truthful fervently.
Byron York is main governmental analogous for The Washington Examiner. Contact astatine byork@washingtonexaminer.com.








English (US)·