Economic hardship aside, Trump tariffs could lower US standing as trade partner

Editor’s note: “Behind the News” is the product of Sun staff assisted by the Sun’s AI lab, which includes a variety of tools such as Anthropic’s Claude, Perplexity AI, Google Gemini and ChatGPT.

The United States on Monday announced 25% tariffs on imports from Japan and South Korea, set to take effect on Aug. 1. These tariffs target major trading partners and focus on automobiles, electronics and industrial products, marking a significant shift in trade policy with key Asian allies[1][2][3].
Key economic impacts

Consumer and business costs
The tariffs will function as a tax on US importers, who typically pass these costs to consumers through higher prices. American manufacturers relying on Japanese and South Korean components face increased production costs, potentially reducing competitiveness or forcing supplier diversification[4].

Inflationary pressures
Economists expect the tariffs to contribute to higher U.S. inflation as import costs rise. The Federal Reserve may need to reconsider its interest rate strategy in response to these price pressures. Combined with other trade restrictions, the cumulative effect could push inflation significantly higher[4][5].

Economic growth impact
The tariffs are projected to reduce overall trade volumes, disrupt supply chains, and dampen business investment due to increased uncertainty. Economic estimates suggest the combined impact of U.S.-imposed and retaliatory tariffs could reduce U.S. GDP by nearly 1%[6]. Financial markets have already reacted negatively, reflecting concerns about future growth prospects[2].

Retaliation risks
Both Japan and South Korea represent critical U.S. allies and major import sources. Retaliatory measures could harm U.S. exporters, particularly in agriculture, technology, and services sectors[3][4]. The administration has warned that retaliation will be met with further tariff increases, escalating the risk of prolonged trade conflict[3].

Industries that could be hit the hardest

• Automobiles and auto parts: Japanese and South Korean vehicles represent significant U.S. imports. The tariffs target both finished vehicles and automotive components, expected to raise consumer prices and disrupt U.S.-based manufacturing[10][11][12].
• Electronics and semiconductors: Consumer electronics including TVs, smartphones, and home appliances will see substantial price increases. South Korean semiconductor exports, critical to U.S. tech manufacturing, face heavy impact[12][13][14].
• Steel and aluminum: Both countries export significant amounts of these materials essential for U.S. construction, automotive, and manufacturing sectors[15][12][14].
• Industrial Machinery: Imports of industrial machinery, machine tools, and related equipment will impact U.S. manufacturing operations reliant on these goods[12][14].

Services sector
While tariffs specifically target goods rather than services, indirect effects include higher operating costs for service providers using Japanese or South Korean equipment, potential disruption in digital and tech sectors, and broader economic slowdown reducing service demand[28][29][30][31].

Global price implications
The tariffs are expected to raise prices not only in the United States but globally. Japan and South Korea’s role as major players in global manufacturing means tariff disruptions will ripple through international supply chains, increasing costs for manufacturers worldwide[24][25].
Recent estimates suggest broad-based tariffs could raise the U.S. price level by over 2% in the short run, with certain categories seeing even higher increases[27]. J.P. Morgan estimates that comprehensive tariffs could dampen global GDP by 0.7%[25].

Strategic rationale behind the tariffs
Donald Trump is raising tariffs on Japan and South Korea primarily to pressure both countries into negotiating new trade agreements with the U.S. that he considers more “equitable and fair” for American interests[13][40][1][3][41].
The administration has expressed frustration over what it views as persistent trade deficits and market barriers that disadvantage US exports. Trump’s letters to the leaders of Japan and South Korea explicitly state that the tariffs are intended to encourage them to open their markets further to U.S. goods and reduce both tariff and nontariff barriers[13][42].
Negotiations with Japan and South Korea have been slower than with other countries, partly due to their domestic political cycles and reluctance to make concessions under tariff threats[13][40]. Trump has made it clear that unless these nations reach new trade deals with the US, the 25% tariffs will go into effect on Aug. 1[13][40][43][41]. The move is part of a broader strategy targeting multiple countries that have not finalized trade agreements with the US, using tariffs as leverage to accelerate negotiations and address what the administration describes as long-standing imbalances in trade relationships[41][44].
Additionally, Trump has warned that if Japan or South Korea retaliate with their own tariffs, the U.S. will further increase its tariffs in response[42]. The overall goal is to secure better terms for U.S. exports and to reduce trade deficits with these key allies[13][40][1][3][41].

Diplomatic implications
Beyond immediate economic effects, tariffs could lead to long-term shifts in U.S. diplomatic ties, especially with close allies like Japan and South Korea.

• Strained relations and erosion of trust: Tariffs reduce demand for foreign goods and create political challenges in maintaining friendly relations, even among close partners. The current approach — imposing broad tariffs and bypassing established treaty commitments — undermines decades of diplomatic work, trust-building and the systems designed to resolve economic disputes peacefully[48][49].
• Retaliation and diversification: Allies are likely to respond with their own tariffs or seek alternative trading partners, reducing their economic dependence on the U.S. This not only disrupts established supply chains but also encourages countries to diversify alliances and reduce reliance on US markets and security guarantees[49][52].
• Destabilization of international systems: The abandonment of multilateral institutions and dispute resolution mechanisms, such as those under the World Trade Organization, further destabilizes the global order and weakens the US’s standing as a reliable partner[48].
• Potential for decoupling: Persistent use of tariffs and economic pressure can prompt allies to rethink their strategic and security relationships with the U.S., potentially leading to a gradual decoupling and a shift toward greater autonomy or new partnerships[48][49][52].

Ways businesses may adapt to higher costs
Companies are implementing various strategies to manage tariff impacts:

• Supply chain diversification: Seeking alternative suppliers in countries not subject to tariffs
• Contract renegotiation: Adjusting terms with suppliers and customers to share tariff burden
• Nearshoring and onshoring: Shifting production closer to the US market
• Product redesign: Reducing reliance on imported components
• Inventory management: Stockpiling critical items before tariff implementation
• Scenario planning: Preparing for different tariff outcomes while maintaining operational flexibility[35][36][37]

Economic projections
The tariffs are expected to generate additional U.S. Treasury revenue but at the cost of higher prices and potential economic slowdown[4]. Market volatility has increased as investors weigh risks of slower growth and higher inflation[2][4]. While tariffs alone may not cause recession, they add significant uncertainty to the economic outlook and could dampen consumer and business confidence[9].

The 25% tariffs on Japan and South Korea represent a significant trade policy shift with far-reaching economic consequences. While generating government revenue, the tariffs will likely raise costs for U.S. consumers and businesses, contribute to inflation, and slow economic growth. The risk of retaliation and ongoing uncertainty could further dampen confidence and investment, making the overall economic impact negative for the U.S.[4][6][5].

Sources

1. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/07/07/trump-tariff-trade-japan-south-korea/84486135007/

2. https://www.ft.com/content/613678ac-2e61-436b-9d0f-2a8f85a20dee

3. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/07/07/trump-japan-south-korea-tariff-25/2aac9306-5b51-11f0-a293-d4cc0ca28e5a_story.html

4. https://financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/trump-to-levy-25-tariffs-on-japan-south-korea-in-august

5. https://keia.org/the-peninsula/the-impact-of-u-s-trade-policy-on-south-korea/

6. https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/trump-tariffs-trade-war/

7. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/stock-market-today-dow-sp-500-nasdaq-sink-as-trump-says-hell-impose-25-tariffs-on-japan-south-korea-162958209.html

8. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/27/business/japan-economy-trump-tariffs.html

9. https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/trump-tariffs-deadline-letters-sent-to-trade-partners-what-to-know-rcna217183

10. https://time.com/7300389/trump-trade-deals-tariff-letters-deadline/

11. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/30/trump-plans-to-slap-japan-with-new-tariffs-amid-stalled-negotiations-00433773

12. https://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2025-07-07/trump-to-put-25-tariffs-on-japan-and-south-korea

13. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/07/us/politics/trump-tariffs-japan-south-korea.html

14. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10525290

15. https://www.reuters.com/business/trump-letters-whos-talking-state-play-tariff-deadline-nears-2025-07-07/

24. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/economy/spotlight/united-states-tariffs-impact-economy.html

25. https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/global-research/current-events/us-tariffs

27. https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/where-we-stand-fiscal-economic-and-distributional-effects-all-us-tariffs-enacted-2025-through-april

28. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/07/us/politics/trump-tariffs-japan-south-korea.html

29. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/07/07/trump-imposes-25-tariffs-on-south-korea-and-japan-at-least-for-now/

30. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-07-07/trump-says-he-ll-levy-25-tariff-on-japan-south-korea-in-august

31. https://financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/trump-to-levy-25-tariffs-on-japan-south-korea-in-august

35. https://www.unicargo.com/trump-2025-tariffs-impacts-and-tactics/

36. https://www.grantthornton.com/insights/articles/tax/2025/new-tariff-paradigm-how-businesses-can-respond

37. https://www.ey.com/en_id/technical/tax-alerts/impact-of-recent-us-tariffs-on-asean-businesses

40. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-unveils-25-tariffs-on-south-korea-and-japan-nearly-identical-to-his-liberation-day-rates-165556527.html

41. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/07/07/trump-tariff-trade-japan-south-korea/84486135007/

42. https://www.axios.com/2025/07/07/trump-tariffs-letters-japan-korea

43. https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/trump-announces-25-tariffs-japan-south-korea

44. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/global-markets-wrapup-1-2025-07-07/

48. https://news.uchicago.edu/story/how-do-tariffs-work-and-who-will-they-impact-uchicago-experts-explain

49. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/07/us/politics/trump-tariff-deadline.html

52. https://www.schiller.edu/blog/trump-tariff-policies-and-international-business-impacts-on-the-us-economy-and-global-finance/