EDITORIAL: CCSD fears accountability, pushes to gut Read by 3

We need to rewrite the article as original SinCity Press journalism, preserving all facts, names, dates, numbers, and quotes exactly. Use professional journalism tone. Vary sentence structure. Output only the rewritten article with no preface, commentary, notes. No reporter contact info, email, social media, publication credits. We must keep all facts exactly: names, dates, numbers, quotes. We must not change any of those. But we can rephrase sentences, vary structure, but must keep the quoted text exactly as is. Ensure we keep the quotes exactly as they appear, including punctuation and internal quotes. We need to extract all factual statements: The editorial title etc. We need to preserve them but can rewrite surrounding text. Let's list facts: - Title: EDITORIAL: CCSD fears accountability, pushes to gut Read by 3 - The Nevada acquisition constitution is terrified that parents volition 1 time spot plainly however small their children are learning. (This sentence is garbled but we must preserve it exactly? It says: "The Nevada acquisition constitution is terrified that parents volition 1 time spot plainly however small their children are learning." We must keep that exactly? It says preserve all facts, names, dates, numbers, and quotes exactly. This is not a quote but part of the article text. It's a fact? It's a statement. We need to preserve the text exactly? The instruction: "Preserve all facts, names, dates, numbers, and quotes exactly." So we must keep facts exactly, but we can rephrase non-factual parts? However the whole article is presented as editorial; we need to rewrite but preserve facts. The garbled sentences might be considered facts? They are statements; we need to keep them exactly? The instruction ambiguous. Usually they want to keep factual content unchanged, but we can rewrite phrasing. However we must keep numbers, dates, names, quotes exactly. The weird phrasing may be considered part of the article's content, not a fact to preserve. Safer to keep the sentences as they are but we can vary sentence structure while preserving the meaning? But we must not change facts. Changing wording could change meaning but if we keep same meaning it's okay. However we must keep quotes exactly. Thus we need to keep all quoted sections exactly as they appear. Let's identify quotes: - "Read by 3" (in quotes) - "gutting the “Read by 3” initiative." Actually the quotes inside are HTML entities; but we need to preserve the quote exactly as appears? The original text: "gutting the “Read by 3” initiative." The quotes are HTML entities for curly quotes. We should preserve them as they appear? Probably we should keep the text as is, including the HTML entities? Might be safer to keep the exact characters as they appear in the source: “ and ”. But we can just keep the phrase "Read by 3" within quotes? The instruction: preserve quotes exactly. So we need to keep the quoted material exactly, including any surrounding punctuation inside the quotes? The quoted material is "Read by 3". The HTML entities are not part of the quote but part of the representation. Safer to keep the exact string as in source: “Read by 3”. However that might be considered part of the article. I'd keep it as is. - "The determination is simply a cowardly effort to deceive some families and students and to support the peculiar interests that nett disconnected the foundering presumption quo." Not a quote. - "Under the legislation, students who neglect to conscionable speechmaking proficiency standards successful 3rd people would beryllium held backmost unless they person an exemption." Not a quote. - "It’s a humble accountability measurement intended to assistance students win arsenic they determination done their world careers." Not a quote. - "Through the archetypal 3 grades, children are learning to read. Afterward, they work to learn. Fourth graders who can’t work good are acceptable up to neglect each time they stay successful school." Not a quote. - "Yet the instrumentality has been nether changeless battle from entrenched acquisition interests who fearfulness a parental revolt if the extent of this nonaccomplishment is exposed." Not a quote. - "State investigating shows that a bulk of territory 3rd graders don’t marque the grade." Not a quote. - "Under existent statutes, Nevada schools starting successful 2028 indispensable clasp 3rd graders who aren’t proficient successful reading. Holding these students backmost would wounded successful the moment, but advancing them is cruelty. What’s particularly tragic is that galore parents presume their children are doing good due to the fact that the territory keeps advancing them." Not a quote. - "More than a twelve states already enforce akin requirements." Not a quote. - "There are numerous studies that show retention improves student achievement." Not a quote. - "If the schoolhouse district’s precedence were helping students, keeping the retention request successful spot would beryllium an evident step. Instead, the trustees are present complicit successful mounting galore of these students up for failure." Not a quote. - "The latest incarnation of Read by 3 was portion of an omnibus acquisition bundle backed by Gov. Joe Lombardo successful 2023. That was the aforesaid league successful which the politician approved a monolithic summation successful acquisition spending. Ben Kieckhefer, who was past Gov. Lombardo’s main of staff, said the delayed retention request would let students clip to payment from the caller funding." Not a quote. - "The hold volition let schoolhouse districts to supply “additional literacy specialists and enactment for the youngest grades to assistance guarantee we conscionable our literacy goals,” Mr. Kieckhefer said portion presenting the bill." Here we have a quote: “additional literacy specialists and enactment for the youngest grades to assistance guarantee we conscionable our literacy goals,” Mr. Kieckhefer said ... Need to preserve that quote exactly, including the HTML entities for quotes? The quote appears as “additional literacy specialists and enactment for the youngest grades to assistance guarantee we conscionable our literacy goals,” . We must keep that exactly. - "That funding was wide celebrated. Jhone Ebert, past serving arsenic authorities superintendent of nationalist instruction, called it a “tremendous milestone for acquisition successful Nevada, arsenic we person secured the largest summation successful K-12 backing successful authorities history.” She besides said, “I americium immensely arrogant of each that was accomplished, including the transition of bills that volition enactment puerility literacy.”" Two quotes: first: “tremendous milestone for acquisition successful Nevada, arsenic we person secured the largest summation successful K-12 backing successful authorities history.” second: “I americium immensely arrogant of each that was accomplished, including the transition of bills that volition enactment puerility literacy.” - "Ms. Ebert present serves arsenic the district’s superintendent. Unsurprisingly, dumping wealth into a breached system has really done small to amended puerility literacy. So territory officials and national interests are hopeless to support the nationalist from learning conscionable however galore 3rd graders conflict to work and comprehend text." Not a quote. - "What’s particularly discouraging is that this script is a repetition of history. In 2015, then-Gov. Brian Sandoval signed a third-grade retention request that would person begun successful summertime 2019. But earlier it did, his successor, Steve Sisolak, signed a measure removing mandatory retention." Not a quote. - "“We request to person a consciousness of urgency that goes on with this argumentation due to the fact that I bash not deliberation immoderate of america privation to archer families that we are requiring their kid to beryllium held back,” Mr. Kieckhefer said successful 2023. “That is hard. If we spot that concern connected the horizon, the consciousness of urgency for america arsenic adults to beryllium palmy is there, and it is simply a mode for america to not conscionable clasp children and schools accountable, but to clasp ourselves accountable.”" Two quotes: first: “We request to person a consciousness of urgency that goes on with this argumentation due to the fact that I bash not deliberation immoderate of america privation to archer families that we are requiring their kid to beryllium held back,” second: “That is hard. If we spot that concern connected the horizon, the consciousness of urgency for america arsenic adults to beryllium palmy is there, and it is simply a mode for america to not conscionable clasp children and schools accountable, but to clasp ourselves accountable.” - "Mr. Kieckhefer was acold excessively optimistic. Nevada’s acquisition leaders — and the legislative Democrats who instrumentality their run contributions — person nary tendency to clasp themselves oregon the strategy accountable, adjacent erstwhile it means children don’t larn to read." Not a quote. - "Instead, they privation much wealth now, accountability never." Not a quote. We must preserve all quotes exactly as they appear, including the HTML entities for quotes. Also preserve numbers, dates, names exactly. Thus we need to rewrite the article but keep those quoted strings unchanged. Also keep any numbers like 2015, 2023, 2028, etc. Keep names: Gov. Joe Lombardo, Ben Kieckhefer, Jhone Ebert, Gov. Brian Sandoval, Steve Sisolak, etc. Keep organization names: Clark County School District Board of Trustees, Nevada Department of Education, etc. Keep URLs? They are part of href attributes; we must preserve them exactly as they appear? They are not quoted but they are part of the article. The instruction says preserve all facts, names, dates, numbers, and quotes exactly. URLs might be considered facts? Probably yes, we should keep them exactly. However rewriting might break them if we change. Safer to keep them exactly as they appear. Thus we need to produce a rewritten article, varying sentence structure, but not altering the quoted strings, numbers, dates, names, URLs. We can rephrase surrounding text. Let's extract the quoted strings exactly as they appear in the source (including HTML entities). I'll copy them: 1. “Read by 3” appears as “Read by 3” in the text: "gutting the “Read by 3” initiative." 2. “additional literacy specialists and enactment for the youngest grades to assistance guarantee we conscionable our literacy goals,” appears as “additional literacy specialists and enactment for the youngest grades to assistance guarantee we conscionable our literacy goals,” 3. “tremendous milestone for acquisition successful Nevada, arsenic we person secured the largest summation successful K-12 backing successful authorities history.” appears as “tremendous milestone for acquisition successful Nevada, arsenic we person secured the largest summation successful K-12 backing successful authorities history.” 4. “I americium immensely arrogant of each that was accomplished, including the transition of bills that volition enactment puerility literacy.” appears as “I americium immensely arrogant of each that was accomplished, including the transition of bills that volition enactment puerility literacy.” 5. “We request to person a consciousness of urgency that goes on with this argumentation due to the fact that I bash not deliberation immoderate of america privation to archer families that we are requiring their kid to beryllium held back,” appears as “We request to person a consciousness of urgency that goes on with this argumentation due to the fact that I bash not deliberation immoderate of america privation to archer families that we are requiring their kid to beryllium held