Darmon Thornton Las Vegas
June 17, 2026 - 9:00 pm
As an electrical conveyance owner, I situation the flawed logic successful Nanette Shahbaz’s missive advocating for a peculiar EV mileage taxation (April 2 Review-Journal).
The assertion that dense user EVs specified arsenic the Tesla Cybertruck are uniquely destroying our roads ignores basal civilian engineering. Nearly each structural roadworthy deterioration is caused by multi-ton commercialized semi-trucks. A 6,000-pound full-size EV causes virtually the aforesaid negligible pavement interaction arsenic a modular 5,000-pound full-size state SUV.
Furthermore, the communicative that EV drivers thrust for escaped is false. We already lend heavy to authorities gross done Nevada’s value-based governmental services tax, resulting successful importantly higher yearly registration fees for newer EVs compared to older, gas-powered vehicles.
EV owners bash not entity to backing roadworthy upkeep. However, creating a punitive surcharge targets next-generation exertion alternatively than solving fiscal shortfalls. If Nevada yet transitions to a modernized mileage-based strategy done the DMV, it should use to each conveyance types, standard reasonably by axle-weight classes and support low-mileage drivers. Let’s money our roads done honorable mathematics and structural equity, not by disproportionately taxing a azygous conception of Nevada taxpayers.
Story continues aft advertisement
Story continues aft advertisement
Story continues aft advertisement
Story continues aft advertisement
Story continues aft advertisement
English (US)·