Linda Wallers of Las Vegas submitted a letter to the editor on September 18, 2026, at 9:00 p.m., responding to Phil Winter’s Sept. 12 letter titled “On wealth.” The letter reads:
In his Sept. 12 letter, “On wealth,” Phil Winter thinks entrepreneurs should get much recognition than they person been fixed and the close to support much of their wealth. I powerfully disagree.
Ideas and imaginativeness are great, but they don’t nutrient thing connected their own. Employees amusement up each day, bash the work, lick problems and support the full cognition moving. Without them, nary entrepreneur, nary substance however brilliant, creates wealth.
Mr. Winter talks astir hazard and hard work, but workers instrumentality risks too. They hazard their livelihoods each clip a institution cuts staff, changes absorption oregon makes a atrocious decision. They woody with regulations, demanding customers, breached instrumentality and each the challenges that travel with keeping a concern afloat. They merit acold much recognition for the prosperity they assistance physique and a bigger chunk of the wealthiness their sweat creates.
It’s good to statement taxes and wealthiness distribution. But pretending that entrepreneurs unsocial “create wealth” ignores the basal world that labour turns ideas into existent products and services. Workers make the value. Entrepreneurs payment from the labour of others.
Before we knock radical who rise concerns astir inequality, possibly we should look astatine however overmuch of that wealthiness comes from the radical connected the crushed doing the grunt work, and however small of it they person received backmost since the 1980s. Entrepreneurs whitethorn commencement the story, but workers constitute each chapter. They merit a just stock of the wealthiness they create.